Free interview details posted anonymously by Springer Nature interview candidates. manuscript under consideration 40editor decision started. Stage 2: Editor assigned. . Editor Decision Started, Nature, 2 0 iRobot 2 Journal Issue. Accept Submission If the decision is to Accept, select the appropriate version (i.e., Review Version, Author Version, or . Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the suitable Associate Editor. Here is my view of a Nature-type editor: <edited> 1. . Join to Connect Nature Publishing Group . Accept Submission If the decision is to Accept, select the appropriate version (i.e., Review Version, Author Version, or . nature communications. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. Last year, she became editor-in-chief of Nature Communications. Editor . If it goes longer that's a good sign because it's probably gone to a sub editor with more expertise in the field. state of nature, in political theory, the real or hypothetical condition of human beings before or without political association. Associate Editor Review Started 2019-01-15 02:53:24. The "manuscript under consideration" is the process of the editor making their case about whether they think the manuscript is worth sending to peer-review. Dr. Shane Snyder. Must be an expert in suggesting ways to improve the science, grammar, persuasiveness and presentation. Answer (1 of 5): Let's put it this way: there are few journals in which it is more difficult to publish than Science or Nature. It can be an office or residential address, as the question specifies. As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. Previously a successful businessman, Elliott underwent neurosurgery for a tumor and lost a part of his brainthe orbitofrontal cortexthat connects the frontal lobes with the emotions. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. meredith.lemasurier@us.nature.com Editorial Experience 10/2014 - present Chief Editor - Nature Neuroscience, Nature Publishing Group 7/2012 - 10/2014 Deputy Editor - Neuron, Cell Press 9/2011 - 7/2012 Senior Scientific Editor and Reviews Editor - Neuron, Cell Press 12/2010 - 9/2011 Senior Scientific Editor - Neuron, Cell Press Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted 2019-01-12 00:06:58. Manuscript under consideration 22th February 22. Editors are responsible for making manuscript decisions based upon reviewer reports and their own reading of the manuscript. Significantly faster than PLOS ONE (2.5x) and Scientific Reports (1.7x). Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. Editorreport summarypolicy check (adobe reader ). Nature Astronomydecition5. Plagiarism and other ethical issues . 2. Year Publication Started 2016 *Crowdsourced data. Sometimes they are more busy. Measuring impact 8. Author Approved Converted Files 2019-01-12 00:26:21 . Multiple rounds of review. NatureEditor Decision Started . Oversight of final editorial decisions editor+decision+started . Nature manuscript receivededitor assignedmanuscript under considerationFigure 1 Guy Nature email Nature . 40. By June 15, 2021 Uncategorized. live manuscriptPost Decision Manuscripts (1 . how editorial teams work together to make initial decisions on manuscripts. 7editor decision started. Nature Catalysis is a Transformative open access journal. Authors can choose to publish using either the subscription publishing route OR via immediate gold Open Access through payment of an article-processing charge (APC). Nature. I think they read and thought about . Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. The reviewers requested substantial edits and the editor gave us 3-6 months to resubmit. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor's decision. Making an editorial decision. She started at Nature Reviews Genetics in 2001, and has spent the better part of two decades immersed in editing. The original turn around time (5 weeks) was very reasonable. Using OJS the Section Editor is able to record the decision about the submission, communicate this decision and the review data to the author, and notify the reviewers while letting them see how others responded to the paper. Peer-review is handled by researchers and scholars. We believe that peer-review needs to be efficient, rigorous, and fair for everyone involved. . Based on the topic of the manuscript and suggestions by the authors, an editor is assigned to handle the manuscript. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . . In the majority of cases, at least two reports will be received which are broadly in agreement, making it possible to assess reviewer comments easily and reach a straightforward decision. If they accept, it will go out for review. manuscript under consideration 40editor decision started. In this module you will learn: editorial processes at different journals. 4. Nature Astronomydecition5. Professional . Online First - Article available online 6. The study is published in Nature Cell Biology. Date of Letter: The date on which letter was addressed to the Editor. what happens to your article after it's accepted. Since the discovery of the chloride ion channel . This is known as a rescinding. Editor Decision Nature Started Status About Nature Decision Status Editor Started It is also important to see that good moral decision making involves more than just acting on hunches or intuitions, though these, too, are important. Poor analysis such as using inappropriate statistical tests or a lack of statistics altogether. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Upload your document for English Language Editing. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications nature scienceBoard of Reviewing Editors Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England. My understanding is that "Editorial Decision Started" means an Editor has been assigned and is reviewing the manuscript. nature~. Nature . 129ScienceUVR8Nature. Editor-in-Chief Decision Complete. X. . system status to indicate this). . In such cases, our decision is based on the paper's appeal to Nature's broad audience, rather than a judgment of its technical robustness. This may be followed by a short stage denoted . Answer (1 of 7): There are several, if not many, variables that would effect the period between submission of a paper to Nature and its publication (or its rejection). . A decision requires further reviews. Like all academic journals, Nature relies on peer-review. : Natureeditor decision started9 0 iRobot 2 ?nature? nature1 . under considerationEditor Decision Started . Brooke LaFlamme, PhD, Associate Editor, Nature Genetics Location: 10-11am, 13-105 CHS, Monday April 18, 2016 Abstract: The editorial and publication process at high impact journals, such as Nature Genetics, is often perceived as confusing and difficult to navigate for researchers.My presentation will provide an overview of the editorial process at . Typesetting 3. Making an editorial decision. Be the first to find . 10-minute lessons. Magdalena is a geneticist by training and has considerable editorial and publishing experience: having started in Nature Publishing Group in 2001, she was Chief Editor of Nature Reviews Genetics, Senior Editor for genetics and genomics at Nature, and more recently Executive Editor for the Nature Partner Journals. With one year behind him as Co-Editor-in-Chief of an Elsevier journal, Dr. Shane Snyder shares his experience about what goes on behind the scenes. 2editor decision started . Chief Editor, Nature Chemical Biology at Springer Nature Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States 181 connections. Here are all the elements of the Letter to the Editor format: Address of the Sender: This segment includes the address of the person sending the letter addressed to the Editor. Based on the Nature Ecology and Evolution Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 76.0 days to accept manuscript. Editors are responsible for making manuscript decisions based upon reviewer reports and their own reading of the manuscript. Cell & Microbiology Jun 02, 2022 0. nature communications. If the decision. "Nature: n/a: n/a: 12.0 days: n/a: n/a: n/a: Rejected (im.) Protocol Exchange is an open repository of community-contributed protocols sponsored by Nature Portfolio. . The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision . The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. NatureEditor Decision Started . LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. Reviews Submit a Review. Perhaps, the subject editor assigned requires more time for assessing the manuscript. Learn more. 28th January 22. 1 Answer to this question Answer: In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days. Our submission system is built from the ground up to make submitting, reviewing and editing as easy - and dare we say enjoyable - as possible. Journal decisions 6. Motivation: We originally submitted to Nature Ecology and Evolution and it was desk-rejected after ~10 days with the option to transfer to Nature Communications. ~. In fact, Nature will have a paper reviewed by two different people who . At this time, the AE read and evaluates the paper.. . . This in turn delivers more in-depth reviews, faster, and more often. Inappropriate methodology for answering your hypothesis or using old methodology that has been surpassed by newer, more . Chloride ion channel ASOR is required for vesicle shrinkage. Editorial decision making at Nature Genetics. . The editorial process 7. editor decision started . For example; too small a sample size or missing or poor controls. Editor-in-Chief Decision Started 2018-12-26 06:07:08. . As a division of Research Square Company, we're committed to making . Article proofs sent to author 4. Editorial decision making at Nature Genetics. While the tips and advice he offers are specific for his own journal, Chemosphere, it's certainly no harm for any researcher to keep them in mind. 2021: Motivation: The process was reasonably quick, particularly since we submitted on the Easter weekend. Editor in Chief, Nature. In particular, when editorial decisions are required about peer reviewed articles where the Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editors, or Editorial Board member is an author or is acknowledged as a contributor, the affected Editor or Editorial Board member will exclude themselves . What the. Awaiting Editor Decision . It has core editorial offices across the United States, continental Europe, and Asia under the international scientific publishing company Springer Nature. Choose Silver or Gold. ~. decision started. Measuring impact | 0h40 | 7 lessons. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. . decision sent to author nature reject. 1manuscript under consideration. 2 Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. The average number of days between the date of manuscript submission and date of receiving the editorial acceptance decision. If the decision is negative, the author can choose to transfer the manuscript - including the reviewer comments to another journal. 6 Springer Nature Editor interview questions and 6 interview reviews. Senior editorNatureSenior editorSenior editor Nature . In the majority of cases, at least two reports will be received which are broadly in agreement, making it possible to assess reviewer comments easily and reach a straightforward decision. We can improve the language in all of your research-related documents: for example, research papers, grant proposals, theses, reports, and news articles. It appears that your manuscript might have passed the initial screening for basic requirements by the handling editor. natureNC20 editorrevisi A publication in either of these journals can cement a scientific reputation, advance academic rank and significantly boost one's. All Reviewers Assigned 2nd February 22. Corrected proofs returned by author 5. Confirmation of receipt 2. with editor2 2with editor4 Scientific Editing includes a Gold English language edit, a developmental edit, a quality assurance edit and a summary report. with editor With editor(Decision Letter Being PreparedReviewers invited) Decision Letter Being Prepared Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. nature~. These are highly prestigious journals. 1 Answer. Share Improve this answer answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14 user18118 21 1 Add a comment 0 The editor contacts the author with the decision. In 2016, Nature Communications published 3,686 papers, and Scientific Reports 21,057, according to their websites. Similarly, APC for Scientific Reports are between $1400 (UK . Scientific Editing. . 11 hours of learning. The notion of a state of nature was an essential element of the social-contract theories of the English philosophers Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) and John Locke (1632-1704) and the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-78). 30 days to first decision (median). Either rejection or sending it out for review. under considerationEditor Decision Started . 4 level 1 The MDPI Editorial Process. 12012229Nature ArticleUVUVR8. Technical reasons for rejection include: Incomplete data. MDPI operates a rigorous and transparent peer-review process that aims to maximize quality. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Decision Sent to Author. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). Get expert in-depth editing and strategic advice on your manuscript, review article or grant proposal from a team of editors following the quality standards set by Nature Research. The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. . 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. We also edit documents from all disciplines - from engineering and medicine to humanities and social sciences. Editors Decision. Using OJS the Section Editor is able to record the decision about the submission, communicate this decision and the review data to the author, and notify the reviewers while letting them see how others responded to the paper. Associate Editor Review Completed 2019-02-14 21:34:24 . Brooke LaFlamme, PhD, Associate Editor, Nature Genetics Location: 10-11am, 13-105 CHS, Monday April 18, 2016 Abstract: The editorial and publication process at high impact journals, such as Nature Genetics, is often perceived as confusing and difficult to navigate for researchers.My presentation will provide an overview of the editorial process at . . Article Stages: 1. the different stages of manuscript handling by editors. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. With editor evaluation . Authors may need to take specific actions to achieve compliance with funder and institutional open access mandates. Depending on the journal, the assignment may be done by technical staff, the journal's chief editor, or automatic by submission category or author suggestion. Research supervision and lecturing skills. -To read an entire article in less than 5 minutes and then prepare to answer questions about the paper and make a decision on whether or not you'd publish it. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. . Based on the Nature Catalysis Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor - days to accept manuscript. alt+f9 nature physics - nature,1,,, . With editor evaluation . . Decision sent to author 24th February 22 Declined. Also known as with editors (APS), review completed, required reviews completed (Elsevier Editorial System (EES)), awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting decision (ScholarOne), awaiting EiC decision (IEEE), Editor Decision Started (AIP), Decision Started (NPG). He . APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services. In most MDPI journals, peer-review is a single-blind assessment with at least two . editor decision started . 36 editors from 20+ Nature Research journals. Institutions receive a free launch webinar presentation at the start of their subscription to help their researchers get started with the course. 7editor decision started. Article processing charges (APC), depending on where you live, may cost you between $4000 (UK) to $6000 (Japan) US dollars (USD) using exchange rates for mid June 2017. With some journals, editors are invited and not assigned.
